The dark side reading of the Widow’s Mite settles a lot of theological problems for this stewardship text.
The Widow’s Mite
The Gospels of Luke and Mark report a similar incident that happened while Jesus was peoplewatching outside the temple where donations were given to support the temple and the religious establishment.
A widow came up to the offering plate. A poor widow, marginalized in society as she was a woman of low status, married once and lost and unlikely to wed again. With the mortality rate how it was, she could have been in her mid 20s or early 30s. Like Daisy Mae in the musical Lil Abner, she is way “past her prime.” The widow came up and put in her last two pennies. She gave her all. She would have nothing to lie back on. She would be completely at the mercy of a world whose cultural norms turned against her. And she gave a penny anyway.
And Jesus commends her.
And we are left asking…why?
Why?
Why was Jesus commending her?
- Was Jesus commending her because the true measure of gifts is not how much is given but how much remains behind? She gave everything so she is better? ‘
- Was Jesus commending her because what matters is the spirit in which the gift is given? She gave out of a different sensibility than the rich Pharisees?
- Was Jesus more concerned with the amount or the percentage?
But then we wonder an even darker thought: Why is a religious reformer like Jesus, who had savage things to say about the religious establishment, commenting on how to give the best gift to the religious establishment, the same establishment that would crucify him a few chapters later?
Jesus commends her.
It doesn’t make sense.
Best argument falls short
Biblical commentators generally say that Jesus says to support the church rather than human needs. That when the choice is between our comfort and the church, we are to give to the church.
That makes for a good stewardship line in contemporary sermons on sacrificial giving and priorities. But that’s not what Jesus says elsewhere in the Gospels.
In Mark 7, Jesus says that people who withdraw their support of their family members and give it to the religious leaders are quite wrong to do so. And scribes and Pharisees who promote that idea are also wrong. If you moved your parents to a cheaper retirement home so you could keep more money for yourself and could give more money to the church, you are in the wrong.
So how could a widow, whose money is used to support her, the marginalized of society, how could she possibly be commended for her gift to the very institution that harmed her.
Jesus commends her.
It doesn’t make sense, using Jesus’ own words.
But wait, there’s more.
In the chapter before (chapter 20) of Luke’s version of the story, Jesus throws down against the religious elites in this way:
“the scribes who like to go about in long robes and the best seats in the synagogue and the place of honor at feasts, who devour widows’ houses and for a pretense make long prayers. They will receive the greater condemnation.”
He calls out the wealthy and powerful of his day, saying that they rob the widows’ houses. Not rob…they devour the widows’ houses. Consume. Eat the livelihood of the marginalized of society.
And like a Hollywood moment that fulfills the foreshadowing, in the next chapter is a widow whose house has been devoured, and she is coming up to give her last to the people that Jesus said devoured her.
Dr. Thomas Long at Candler School of Theology said in a sermon once:
“This woman gave everything, alright…they took every last penny from her.”
And Jesus commends her.
Or does he?
The Widow’s Lament
Read again what Jesus said:
He looked up and saw rich people putting their gifts into the treasury; he also saw a poor widow put in two small copper coins. He said, “Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put in more than all of them; for all of them have contributed out of their abundance, but she out of her poverty has put in all she had to live on.”
Jesus does not commend the woman. No “congratulations” or “blessed are” or “the kingdom of God is like.”
Rather, Jesus describes the scene. Jesus doesn’t commend. He laments.
- He laments that the woman, the victim of the religious value system, gave up more than the perpetuators of that system.
- He laments that she lost more than the ones who benefitted from it.
It’s a tale as old as time. The people forced out of their homes in 2008 lost more than the bankers who lost jobs–and none of them went to debtors prison. The swamp wasn’t drained and the states who voted 70% or more for the current administration will be the first to lose health care.
Jesus laments the victim of oppression, he doesn’t commend her.
Indeed, Jesus even sees her gift as a waste as the following verses of Luke 21 indicate the very temple that the widow was contributing to would fall, and we know historically it did. She gave an offering that was a waste.
And Jesus laments. Along with the widow.
Never Again
Why would Jesus tell such a sad and misunderstood story?
Because Jesus began the revolution that said never again.
- Never again will the marginalized be left out of the blessings of God and the Church call it good.
- Never again will we turn a blind eye while our leaders harm those in poverty and the Church call it good..
- Never again will people who don’t fit the mold be left on the threshing floor and the Church call it good..
- Never again…unless you let it.
Jesus calls us to remember the widow and put our all in the basket. To be all in to be the voice of protest and solidarity, that stands with the least and the lost. To be all in to substantive gifts of charity and substantive efforts towards justice. To be all in to education of our young people and iron-sharpening-iron experiences for our adults. To be all in using our connections and gifts to make justice happen, not just lament how things are.
Are you all in?
Or do the powers and principalities that devour widows have the last word, and you remember her only to think about how much you’ll tithe this year?
The Widow’s Might
In closing, I’ve sold the widow short, and I need to apologize for that.
Yes, she was devoured by the men. Yes, she lost everything to a culture that despises broken families and lacked grace.
But in my mind, she walked up to that offering plate with her head held high and defiant. She wanted to make the Pharisees and tax collectors and high and mighty see her face, saying look what you made me do.
Novel Prize Winner Leymah Gbowee has spoken before about the day she won the Nobel Peace Prize, saying
“There is a saying ‘He who is down fears no fall.’
Well, if I am already down, I can speak truth.”
I like to believe the widow spoke her truth in that moment as the pennies clinked into the offering plate.
Do you hear it?
Your turn
Thoughts?
Thanks for reading, commenting, and your shares on social media.
Notes:
- Biblical exegesis informed by “The Widow’s Mites: Praise or Lament?—A Matter of Context” by Addison G. Wright (PDF).
- Final section inspired by Rev. Janessa Chastain, Desert Southwest Annual Conference
Andy
Ha! I was just joking with my family about my desire to work Taylor Swift’s lyrics into a sermon, and here you’ve done it!
Nice interpretation of the text. Well done.
Teresa
Jesus in his movements also condemns the temple by sitting “in opposition” to the treasury. I love your interpretation. Definitely a way to look at the story that upsets the status quo interpretation. Perhaps that is what is needed in this day and age. Thanks for your work.
Laura Farley
I don’t know why I never saw it this way before. Makes perfect sense. This interpretation fits in with Jesus’ teaching more so than the traditional. Thanks for the eye opener.
Becky Coleman
Thank you for new insights.
Jan Ping
God bless you, Jeremy. God keep you safe from the harm which may come your way for speaking truth to power. You “do” church with every keystroke. You’ve “made my day” so often — and today is certainly one of those days! You’ve given me renewed hope and you’ve energized my will to work. Thank you.
Ruth
Thank you.
Beth Ann Cook
You have written something I truly appreciated, Jeremy. Wonders never cease.
Debbie Coutts
Great read…as usual. Thanks, Jeremy. I always appreciate your perspective!
Victoria Bailey
I wrote about this aspect of the story back in seminary in the late 80’s, and later preached a sermon arguing that Jesus was not praising the action of the widow but pointing out the injustice of religious structures and authorities that took everything from those who were marginalized and had nothing. Seminary prof was not convinced of my argument, but the little church I served thought it was worth discussing. Delighted to read your presentation here. Thanks.
Kristy Besada
Yes! I cannot read it any other way. In the same way, I think turning the other cheek, giving your shirt (as well), and walking the extra mile are also “look what you made me do” moments. From our positions of privilege, it’s easy to forget (dismiss?) how very subversive Jesus actually was. He’s less intimidating when he quietly wanders in a verdant pasture with a lamb draped around his shoulders. Nicely done.
David Valera
Being born in a country with an abundance of widows, i have always been in awe of their dedication (by consistently giving) to the church, even when they are down to their last two pesos.
And as a pastor that represents the receiving institution, I am at a loss of words to explain why these widows are even apologetic for their “meager” level of giving. “Sorry Pastor, this is all i have” is a line i have heard too often serving barrio churches in the Philippines.
I once asked a widow why she gave to the church, and she said, “It’s my obligation to support the church, and it’s what my (widowed) mother taught me to do.”
And then i realized, that this response is a learning that has been passed on throughout the generations of our christian culture.
I guess when the pale skinned folks known as “conquistadors” came to colonize the islands in the 17th century, they taught us how to give and obliged us to support the institution. And in return they showed us their own two MIGHTS. The sword and the cross.
Thank you Jeremy. Thank you.
William
You have got it right.
Blessings,
+William
Claudia Roberts
Thinks for the new perspective. I see now that it was an act of defiance. “Here take these last two pennies Now you can take no more from me because even if you try to take my life, it already belongs to God.” I will never think of this as an example of tything again.