We cannot excuse Trump’s violations in the past and present because of the possibility of a political deus ex machina in the future.
The Jaw Bone of an Ass
As a Christian, I have to say that Christians drive me crazy.
Crazy enough for me to waste a blog post on American presidential politics in order to correct a Christian sentiment that I believe is fatally flawed.
After the video of Trump’s 2005 discussion of sexual assault was shared by the Washington Post, I saw an uptick in one meme that I had seen only sporadically in Christian circles before. Here’s the clearest example set in the context of encouraging folks to support Trump over Clinton, even after the video aired:
It’s all about anointing. God anointed many through life who were still being refined and defined. Their carnality did not stop the plan and the anointing for the project.
God used the jaw bone of an ass to destroy 1000 men in the hands of a man who had a weakness for Philistine women. God used this man to begin to deliver Israel from the hands of the enemy.
God did not and never anointed Jezebel. One is carnality, yes, but God works with our carnality ever moment. But the other is wicked and evil plot to gain control.
There are many versions of the meme, but they all center around anointing and Samson or some other biblical character’s sins being excused because of what one action they did for God.
Explanation
Here’s the basic framework: God uses flawed people throughout history to protect and build up God’s Chosen People. Throughout the Old and New Testaments, we see Moses killed a man, David killed a man and married his widow, Jacob was a liar, the Apostle Paul spent his life murdering Christians, and even Noah got drunk first thing off the ark. All of these people played powerful essential roles in the history. This is absolutely true and inspirational for all of us who are not perfect.
The historical character that the Christian Meme above refers to is Samson, the Sunday School character who was super-strong until he was seduced by Delilah and lost his super-powers on the barbershop floor. Samson was blinded and enslaved, but regained his power in time to push over some pillars and cut off the head of the Philistine’s leadership.
But before all that, Samson broke several rules and took a Philistine wife–which was against the Covenant. He had serious flaws and killed thousands of people, but that’s all okay, the story goes, because he chosen by God for that purpose–and the people he killed were a rival tribe anyway.
For the full story, read Judges 13-16, with chapter 16 as the best-known part of the story.
Political Parallel?
By now you can see the political message. If Trump is like Samson, then his alleged violations and indiscretions–bragging about sexual assault, leering at Miss Universe contestants in changing rooms, and all the other things–they don’t matter.
How on earth could they not matter, especially to the Moral Majority? The meme says because if he is elected, he’ll have the potential to accomplish conservative Christian goals (ie. nominate a pro-life Supreme Court justice who will finally eliminate abortion access once and for all in America). Jezebel (ie. Hillary) will not, so she is to be defeated at all costs.
Even though he has a multitude of sins and is blinded and bound by the media, Trump could stand next to the pillars of sin and finally do what he is called to do. That the allegations mostly come from people in the media and in Hollywood culture–which the Moral Majority categorically opposes as carnality–means the violations occured to people from another tribe anyway.
That’s the message, and it hinges on Samson’s “anointing” as the Trump Card (ha!) that covers over all his previous indiscretions, which Trump is also named as being anointed too (1, 2).
The Problem with Anointing
I asked my friend The Rev. Ric Shewell, a United Methodist pastor in Idaho (and guest contributor on this blog), what he thought of the anointing meme, and this is what he said:
That meme is the worst way of approaching the Bible. Let’s not get too loosey-goosey about using the word “anointed.” It doesn’t just mean blessed or chosen. In Moses’ time, it was a way of consecrating priests. In David’s time, it was a way of consecrating kings. It was a physical sign of God’s act in making someone holy (set apart) for a specific function.
By the way, “anointed” is never used for Samson, but it is used for Saul–the leader that the people cried out for despite God’s warnings. King Saul actually was anointed, and God took it back because he was acting like a fool (1 Samuel 15). There’s nothing “permanent” about being anointed in the Bible.
We see that Samson was not anointed at all, though Judges 13 indicates he was born to be special (or written that way in retrospect). His indiscretions and breaking of covenants were not necessary steps towards becoming used by God, but they were adapted to be used in that way.
And here’s the key: the decision to use Samson in that way was from God, not from humans. We did not know and only see it clearly in retrospect.
Only One Anointed One
Rev. Shewell concludes with this reminder:
After Israel’s string of bad kings and exile, they longed for an “Anointed One,” who would restore the kingdom like David. The sought after “Anointed One” would make all things right. “Anointed” in Hebrew is Messiah, and in Greek it’s Christ.
For Christians, Jesus of Nazareth is our “Anointed One.” He’s THE “Anointed One.” We made it his name. We call ourselves “Christians” for it. So to use “anointed” like spiritually blessed or chosen for a job is to take it away from Jesus. He is THE anointed one. Christians of various traditions tread dangerously with how they throw around that word.
Anointing is used to protect God’s Chosen People in the Old Testament, that is true. But as Christians, we follow only one Anointed One and cannot ascribe that to anyone else who we think may be blessed or chosen.
We cannot excuse the actions of the present because of the possibility of a political deus ex machina in the future. That sort of self-justification could excuse any sin, even voting for the Zodiac Killer because they might outlaw abortion. The ends do not justify the means, and the ends are God’s domain anyway.
We are called to vote for the candidate that matches our politics and values, without trying to explain away egregious violations as somehow “all part of God’s plan.” My hope is that as the election enters its final 30 days we Christians do better about explaining our values and really wrestling with the violations and violence instead of blaming God for all this mess. That’s not a faithful response that we are called to be.
Your turn
Thoughts? Sorry for the political commentary, but it was too much of a meme for me to let go of.
Thanks for your comments and your shares on social media.
Kathy Raines
Thank you for writing this, Jeremy (and Ric).
My only critique is your wording in the first paragraph under “Explanation” – we have no way of knowing that the stories cited are ‘absolutely true’ – although I don’t think that’s what you’re saying anyway.
I think that Evangelical Christians do use the theme of ‘anointing’ to indicate someone being called to a special purpose, but I like your reminder that we already have The Anointed One in Jesus. (And why vote for someone whose priorities are so polar-opposite to Jesus’ priorities?)
And my overall rebuttal, if a Trump supporter would listen, is: “Yes, I get that your primary concern is the Supreme Court. Tell me why you would trust a President Trump to appoint a pro-life justice. Trump was pro-choice up until the moment he decided to run for president. He has a history of inconsistency in his personnel choices and stances.”
Brad Kirk
Jeremy,
Good blog post. Good reasoning. This is yet another way to frame how the ends don’t justify the means. This is the first blog post of yours where I have found myself genuinely enjoying your writing and agreeing with you. I hope to find more points of agreement in the future and I hope you continue to write as you did here. Well done.
April Edson
Thank you for your Biblically based response to the frightening way people are twisting the Word for political gain. My family and I were blessed to have Ric as our Pastor in Boise for years and as a result I’m pretty sure my kids,as adults now,have a better knowledge base of their Bible than I do! Blessings to you.
bthomas
Do not agree with use of the word crazy. Do agree that the blog post was wasted as it utterly failed to address the egregious unethical and criminal conduct of Clinton. At best it merely appears biased. At worst,partisan.
Rev. Karen Booth
I don’t agree with a lot of what you write, Jeremy, but I do on this topic. When magazines on opposite ends of the political/cultural spectrum — The Atlantic Monthly and World Magazine (both of which I subscribe to) — call for Trump to resign from the race, thoughtful Christian ought to at least pay attention. My personal problem is that I can’t cast my vote for Clinton, either. Not sure what I’ll do at the ballot box.